On May 16, 1988, the Supreme Court ruled that police officers, without a warrant, have the right to inspect curbside rubbish for evidence. Justice Byron R. Whites opinion for the majority said the privacy of garbage bags left outside the home and its immediate surroundings is not protected by the Fourth Amendment because people have no subjective expectation of privacy in their garbage that society accepts as objectively reasonable (Taylor 559-560). The Supreme Courts ruling on curbside rubbish is fair because people voluntarily leave their trash at the curb for collection. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. This basically means police officers cannot come into a home and just rummage through personal belongings. However, many people feel the Supreme Courts ruling is a violation of the Fourth Amendment because they feel rummaging through garbage is rummaging through their personal belongings. A persons trash is private and can reveal very personal information. A search of trash, like a search of the bedroom, can relate intimate details about sexual practices, health and personal hygiene. A single bag of trash testifies eloquently to the eating, reading and recreational habits of the person who produced it (Krier 555). However, this same trash can also provide the only clue police can find to bust a criminal. Safety should be more important than a little privacy.As long as police officers are not using items like bank statements or credit card applications for their personal advantage, there really is no reason for anyone to be worried about the trash searches. There shou...
