The mystery of human origin is an often-debated topic. It is an issue that can never be proven, something as vague as the existence of God, the proof of a human soul, or even as evasive as the human psyche itself. The debate itself is divided between two main camps: the Evolutionists, who concur with Darwin's theory of evolution, survival of the fittest, and natural selection. They believe that mankind evolved from earlier versions of hominids, which in turn evolved from earlier primates. The other camp follows the theory of Creationism, preferring the Bible to the works of Darwin. They claim that mankind was created by God as in Genesis. Both sides attempt to use scientific fact to back their claims, although the Creationists tend to proclaim faith as their main source of conviction. As for my own personal opinion, I tend to reside nearer the Evolutionist side of the argument. I believing that God, or whatever divine being or force that exists, spun the celestial matter that makes the basis for any and all substance throughout the universe in such a way to cause it all to unfold as a pattern, a preordained system that perpetuates itself. This system is evolution, the gradual complication of life forms via adaptation and genetic mutation. While this may all seem a bit vague and metaphysical, I will attempt to explain my views in a more rational manner.To say that evolution is untrue is, to me, a fallacy. Archeological evidence supports evolution in hundreds of ways. One example is Archaeopteryx. This fossil appears to be the missing link between dinosaurs and birds, a clear definition of what the theory of evolution predicts. More specifically to the study of human origins, archeological findings have uncovered scores of fossils dating from far in the past, fossils that appears to be human at first glance, but contain markedly different features. These fossils give evidence to the theory of evolution, for they illustrat...
