JordanCollege Writing IIFebruary 4, 2001Bias HistoryWhile researching the early relations between the American Indians, and the first European settlers, Jane Tompkins found that the way history was recorded seemed to mislead her. In her essay “ ‘ Indians’: Textualism, Morality, and the problem of History,” Tompkins found that the historians put prejudice facts, and looked down upon Native Americans. Clearly it is seen that even through time, historians are still this way. This dilemma must be illuminated to find out who and why this has happened. Some of the historical cases that Tompkins read were of the time of the exploration. When first coming to America, the Europeans knew only the life that they lived, so when they saw what the Native Americans were doing, they were perplexed. Seeing what they did, puritans automatically came to the assumption that they were barbaric savages. Some of the earliest accounts often change views and could confuse people. One source says that they were loving people, the others tell of how they treated each other and captives. William Wood, a writer in London, wrote, “…they are loving people, but also win the love of those that never saw them, and wipe off that needless fear that is too deeply rooted in the conceits…”(272). On a contrary to this Alexander Whitaker, a minister, wrote “these naked slaves…serve the divell for feare, after a most base manner, sacrificing sometimes…their own children” (573). In this situation it is hard to tell what the American Indians were really like. Either they were too different tribes, or they felt like manipulating the prosperous settlers. Little did they realize that people would look back to this information hundreds of years later Early writers, giving the perception of Native Americans as they did, “rectified” the more resent and not so recent historians. Historians of this era,...
