In the article, “Society Should Encourage Teens to Postpone Sex Until Marriage,” Joseph Perkins argues that in order to avoid unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases, teen should be taught to abstain from sex, rather than be taught about condoms and other forms of birth control. Perkins also suggests that, “sexual activity… outside of marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects.” Perkins also points out that since more abstinence-only programs have been introduced, “teen-age pregnancies, abortions, and births have fallen. Perkins sets out in this article to advise adults that if they convey the message that premarital sex is wrong, that teens are more likely to listen.Now there are many ways to look at this argument. I, like Perkins, believe that teens should postpone sex until marriage, but just about everything that Perkins says after that, has me up in arms. With so many sexually transmitted diseases going around nowadays, it is crucial that teens be informed on how they can protect themselves. It’s great that so many teens that are participating in these abstinence-only programs are deciding to abstain from sex until marriage, but what about those teen who decide that they aren’t? What happens to them? In Perkins scenario, those teens will be ill-informed about birth control, and when they do have sex, those will be the teens that will either become pregnant, catch an STD, or even both. Now isn’t that what Perkins is trying to avoid? In addition to Perkins abstinence only program, I also disagree with his thought that if adults advocate that premarital sex is wrong, that teens will listen. Now I am closely winding down my years as a teenager, and I can speak from personal experience, that if your parents tell you that you are not supposed to do something, be it going to a rated R movie, staying out late, or having sex, chances...
