Knight -vs- Squire: The Comparison of Time Periods in The Canterbury Tales One of the most important pieces of English literature is Geoffrey Chaucers, The Canterbury Tales. This piece is highly regarded, because it gives insight into the simplicity of life in England, through its extensive cast of characters. One of the most important parts of this piece is the General Prologue. The General Prologue is very important to the piece, because Chaucer uses it to contrast characters with similar backgrounds or jobs. This contrast can be seen vividly in the descriptions of the Knight and the Squire. Both the Knight and the Squire are examples of warriors, but of different ages and social standing; because of this, Chaucer is able to depict the differences between the attitudes of the late Medieval society and blossoming age of Renaissance. By using similar characters and similar characterizations, Chaucer is able to illuminate the vast differences between the Knight and the Squire.Chaucers primary description of the Knight and his battles is that of untarnished virtue. Chaucer says, ...he loved chivalrye, Trouthe and honour, freedom and curteisye (General Prologue, 45-46). Chaucer describes the Knight as the perfect noble knight. The Knights true love is of chivalry and honor. He is depicted as a warrior who does his duty, because it is right. He believes in what he does, and isnt a warrior for any other reason. Chaucer further portrays this quality about the Knight through the battles which he has been involved in. The Knight was never involved in a battle of secular nature. The Knight only fought in religious wars. Chaucer once says, ...And foughten for our faith at Tramissene... (General Prologue, 62). This line implies that the Knight fought for the religious faith of the land or King. When in battle, the Knights intentions were always noble. The Knight never had any hidden agendas, and never fought for the prospect o...
