Potlatch- The Sharing and Shaming A potlatch is defined by Barbara Miller as A grand feast in which guests are invited to eat and to receive gifts This is shown in the last film we saw, Ongkas Big Moka. Ongka had been the receiving end at a potlatch in the past, and it was his turn to provide the feast. However, Later, when it is the guests turn to hold a potlatch, they will try to give away as much as - or more than - their host did, thus shaming him into giving the next potlatch.We see this in the way Ongka feels compelled to provide almost 200 more pigs than his hosts did when he was their guest.Ongkas people did not have any kind of wealth (other than animals). Whatever type of class structure there might be came from the amount a person would give at their potlatch. The functional theory Miller refers to looks at a given practice or belief in terms of its contribution to the cultural continuity. The contribution to the cultural community. When a person gives a great amount at a potlatch, because it is a contribution to the cultural community, that person gains a certain stature.Therefore, it is not really the generous nature of a person that leads him to provide these things for his community, but rather, the stature that they can gain from this donation.This is not true of the Igbo people in Chinua Achebes Things Fall Apart. While the Igbo people do engage in reciprocal gift giving, they are more apt to share with a guest the kola nuts which contain, like coffee, a mild stimulant.In the Igbo culture, wealth is more determined by the amount of wives and children that he can support. This may be seen as true with Ongka too; since the wealth in that culture is determined mainly by animals and the amount they can provide at a potlatch, these things are ...
